Comments on: Ipod Touch: My Week 37 vs. My Week 38 http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/ Lonman06's Rumors, News, Tweaks and Hacks Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:06:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: joelberez http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-4494 Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:20:49 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-4494 are you all retarded?
its clearly an iphone and an itouch

shens

]]> By: Xero http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-189 Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:49:37 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-189 Everyone at this point should have a iPod they are happy with. I hope no one is still stuck holding onto a week 37 that wasn’t fixed by the update from Apple. From what I heard most people are happy with the 37s after the update. Of course there are still people who are having problems as well though.

]]> By: lonman06 http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-121 Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:21:29 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-121 Look on the back of your iPod Roleigh, at the bottom you will see a serial number. If it has a 37 in it then it’s week and a 38 means weak 38.

]]> By: Roleigh http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-94 Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:16:27 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-94 How do you find out what week your Ipod Touch is?

]]> By: TeTU http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-92 Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:01:36 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-92 iPods don’t have built in cameras YET you mean :)

Being someone that is very well informed on iPods, the article made sense to me.

What a difference there was between the two models. I had no idea it was this bad.

]]> By: Matt http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-91 Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:39:44 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-91 I think the article was well written. It made perfect sense to me. Anyone that was thinking about buying or had an iPod Touch would understand this article perfectly. And I think this article was written for those people and Lonman assumed that those were the people reading it.

Everyone knows an iPod doesn’t have a built in camera!

]]> By: lunawolf http://lonman06.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-85 Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:26:21 +0000 http://lonman06.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/ipod-touch-my-week-37-vs-my-week-38/#comment-85 Oh, ok, I see. The way the paragraph is written, he doesn’t make it clear where the picture came from. I read the rest of comment #3, which I referenced in my last comment, and he agrees with me.

I wasn’t arguing about week 37 or 38 because I hadn’t heard anything about it and quite frankly don’t give a damn either way. I honestly thought the author was pulling a prank and trying to get people to believe his iPod takes pictures and that the two pictures were of the same woman at a different time.

I look very, very bad?
I wonder, does the author agree that the post may not have been clear, now that two people have commented on the clarity of the article?
That doesn’t serve to ruin my image in any way, contrary to what you might think, azy. Telling someone they look very, very bad on the internet is akin to screaming at a deaf person. I don’t care how I look, but you, sir or madame, write like a zealot by trying to insult me in such a way. Goodnight.

]]>